1. Progress
    • Review results as reported in annual reports since the project was approved.
    • How do accomplishments compare with objectives as described in the project outline?
    • If project is not on track relative to objectives, are reasons given in annual reports?
    • Rate the project on degree of accomplishment of stated objectives. (excellent, good, poor, unacceptable)
  2. Multistate Collaboration
    • Have project activities demonstrated a truly collaborative effort between the various PIs and institutions involved? Are they using common protocols, shared equipment, uniform trials or analyses, etc.?
    • Are there any linkages with external stakeholder groups or other entities outside the project members’ institutions?
    • Have any joint efforts for outside funding resulted from the technical committee or a subset of the committee? Have any resources or assistance been obtained from federal or state agencies or the private sector to support the project?
    • Rate this project on its level of collaboration within and outside the project technical committee. (excellent, good, poor, unacceptable)
  3. Information and Technology Transfer
    • What information and/or technology transfer has occurred from this project?
    • Rate this project on plans and/or accomplishments for delivering the results to users, which include other researchers (journal articles, technical reports, etc.), Cooperative Extension, industry, producers, students, etc. (excellent, good, poor, unacceptable)

List any other comments relative to this project’s progress and suggestions for improvements or enhancements.